When Co-Design Becomes a PR Exercise: Learning from Australia’s Live Export Debacle

Co-Design vs Performative Consultation Co-design has become the darling of public policy. Governments and organisations everywhere trumpet their commitment to collaborative decision-making, promising to work alongside affected communities to shape policies that impact them. But what happens when co-design is deployed not as a genuine collaborative process, but as window dressing for decisions already made? … Read more

The Vanishing Village: What we lost when we stopped joining things — and why co-design may be how we get it back

Village people engaging and enjoying outside space and sunshine, reflecting community spirit, inclusion, and place-based connection.

Social capital has been quietly collapsing across Australia for fifty years. Volunteering is at an all-time low, loneliness now carries health risks equivalent to smoking fifteen cigarettes a day, and trust in government continues to fall. Drawing on research from Robert Putnam, Andrew Leigh, Hugh Mackay, and Julianne Holt-Lunstad, this article examines what we have lost, why it matters for the health and wellbeing of Australian communities, and why genuine co-design may be the most practical path toward rebuilding the social fabric we have allowed to unravel.

Gender Equity, Kindness, and the Screen Between Us

Two people sitting on bench outside on phone screens, illustrating digital connection and modern communication in community spaces.

Half a century of equity reform has produced real gains — and real resistance. From the gender pay gap to the rise of the manosphere, this article examines where Australia stands on gender equality, what the evidence tells us about coercive control and online radicalisation, and why structured co-design at community level may be one of our most practical tools for rebuilding common ground.

Why Co-Design Delivers Better Results

Team collaborating under facilitator guidance, demonstrating co-design, shared leadership, and teamwork.

For generations human history has been littered with evidence that people want to be included in decisions which affect them.  In 1789, the French Revolution echoed to calls for liberty, equality and fraternity; one of the most memorable rallying cries of any movement.  Liberty spoke to the need to be free of rules imposed by … Read more

Co-Design In Place Is Better

Participants engaged in focus group discussion, demonstrating co-design, inclusion, and shared decision-making.

Co-Design In Place Is Better, as a sense of place has captivated humankind for millennia.  For many, where we come from provides a deep sense of meaning, security and identity.  However, for an increasing number of people where they come from is a determinant of lifelong prospects.  Our postcode determines how well we live because resources are not equally distributed.

The Co-Design Paradox: Better Solutions, Faster

Tracey Johnson & Natasha Doherty speaking about good co-design at ADF Conference - Prevention in Place

The Co-Design Paradox: It is not about having a few meetings with representatives at the table. It is a process that starts far earlier to define the real need. Digging into that is a real process of discovery which starts with a plan.  That plan is for how to explore the current state, engage the big stakeholders who control resources, explore their perspectives and together develop a unified plan for community engagement. 

Unlock Better Solutions: The Democratic Power of Co-Design

Group of people of different ages, symbolizing diversity, intergenerational engagement, and community connection.

The Democratic Power of Co-Design. The world is full of need. Our resources to respond are limited. Scarcity prevails. We need to unlock better solutions. Beyond the limits to budgets to address need, there are also limits to how people understand each other.  Communication theory and teachings on strategy are replete with reminders to: